Monday, March 10, 2014

Blog # 8 Gentrification in Silicon Valley

This picture above is a picture of the protesters blockading the Google Bus.



For this week’s blog, we looked at the issue of Google buses being funded in San Francisco and how this affects their residents. To be honest, I had no clue what this topic consisted of, but after doing the readings on the topic I feel I understand the general idea of it. This topic was very interesting to me because I never would have thought Google would have a need for such a thing as a Google bus. The Google Bus in the San Francisco Bay Area has become a recent target for accusations of gentrification, eviction and displacement. The definition of gentrification is a shift in an urban community towards wealthier residents and/or businesses and increasing property values. In the process of gentrification, the residents of cities are paying the price for these changes. The Google Bus, which serves as the private transportation system for wealthy Google workers that brings them from their San Francisco homes to their Silicon Valley jobs, has become a symbol of inequality within the area. According to Goldman’s “When companies break the law and people pay: The scary lesson of the Google Bus” article, it has revealed that rents near the shuttle stops are rising faster than those farther away from it. It also shows that Google buses have allowed their riders (Silicon Valley employees) to rise above the rules and restrictions of “normal” transit riding citizens. An example is how single car drivers may be ticketed for blocking up spaces such as public bus stops because it interferes with the public transit system. However, while this could happen to the single car drivers, the Google buses and shuttles don’t seem to be facing that kind of issue at all. According to the same article “Google, Facebook and Apple aren’t facing millions in unpaid parking fines, however, because the MTA hasn’t been writing the tickets.  Since the shuttles began using public bus stops, they’ve simply flouted the law without consequences.”

It is my opinion that the situation with the Google busses in San Francisco can be related to the issue of digital divide. It is the poor communities that are suffering at the expense of wealthier communities at the cost of their homes. The way that this is happening is the busses are creating more traffic and creating a denser population of people in the areas that the busses travel to. This in turn increases the cost of the city and increases real estate rates. As a result it causes the lower income people to become displaced since they are not able to afford the increased living of cost prior to the prevalence of the Google busses. This situation also raises issues of race because as in most cities the poorest residents are minority or first generation residents so when poor residents are displaced they are most likely low income residents.  This is the reason why most of the protesters of the Google busses in San Francisco Bay area are the low- income communities of color. These protestors set up demonstrations so large that they can attract the attention of the social media. By doing this, they are giving themselves a chance to be heard. By doing this, they are showing people just how much they believe in their cause against Google busses.

Sunday, March 2, 2014

Blog 6/7: Free Labor in the Digital Economy & The Deadly Labor Behind our Tech




In “How the Internet Enables Intimacy”, Stefana Broadbent talks about the concept of the democratization of intimacy. She explained that technology is not quite the distraction from the real world as people are making it out to be. It is true that people are spending more time on their phones and computers but at the same time they are building relationships with other people. She claims that the relationships that people build online/ through technology are more safe and intimate. With technology it is able to pull people away from the real world when they are glued to the computer, but it can also open up the door to new relationships that we can make online.  For example, soldiers who are out fighting in another country can talk/ Skype to their family members back home. Another example is the baker who works at 4am pulls away from his work in order to give a call to his wife at the start of her day. It is because of technology that we have been able to make these connections that we were never able to make before.
Broadbent also brings to our attention that those in power are trying to limit us from communicating freely with others. Like at businesses, they try to keep their employees focused on the work they need to complete. While at schools, they try to keep their students focused on the lecture that they are receiving. Broadbent also mentions how students tend to answer texts in class by doing it underneath their desks. Today, at least 50% of anybody who has access to email at work is actually doing private email. Broadbent’s studies also revealed that 75% of people admit to doing private email at work, while 100% of them admit to texting. In some cases, I believe that the rule to not use a cellphone or other communication device is important. If you're being paid to complete a certain task at a desk job, and you are completing those tasks efficiently, I believe that it is perfectly acceptable to make a call or answer a text once in a while, just as long as it doesn't interfere with the work you are required to finish/ work on. If however, making personal calls or answering texts causes you to fall behind at work, then it needs to stop.






 (texting while at work (on left) texting in class (below))
 


 

A connection can be made here between this and the labor force in Foxconn.  Foxconn is a company that will work anyone willing to the bone paying them the most minimal wages. They over work them and don’t pay them for the overtime while giving them poor living and working conditions. In one of its factories located in China, the workers there are living in factory dorms with roommates who are working different shifts in the day. The differences that the workers have with the different shift times and the different dialects of Chinese they speak prevents the workers from being able to make close connections with each other. This type of workplace refers to the isolated expectation of the work sphere that was in place before the democratization of intimacy explained by Broadbent.